Choose an agent

Choose Cursor, Codex, or Claude for the task

The best runtime is the one that is configured, supports the control surfaces your task needs, and fits the work. FireCursor exposes readiness and capability differences so provider choice can remain explicit.

By FireCursor product teamFor Teams with more than one agent runtimeOutcome Select a provider without losing task boundaries
LinkedInRedditEmail
FireCursor Android Command Center project overview
Current FireCursor Android product interface

Quick answer

The shortest useful version.

Start with readiness, then compare project-native controls, the task’s required tools, account boundaries, and whether you want local execution or Cursor Cloud. Do not choose by brand alone.

Step by step

Do this with confidence.

  1. 01

    Eliminate unavailable paths

    Check authentication, setup, CLI health, and supported integration surfaces. An unavailable provider is not a useful candidate.

  2. 02

    Match the control surface

    Decide whether the task depends on project commands, specific model controls, plan approval, MCP interactions, or a provider-specific rule file.

  3. 03

    Choose the execution boundary

    Local providers work through the paired computer. Cursor Cloud can continue when that computer is offline, under the Cursor account and cloud boundary.

  4. 04

    Preserve the handoff

    If you switch providers, transfer a bounded brief with project identity, instructions, decisions, and evidence instead of pasting an unstructured transcript.

A practical decision frame

  • Cursor: use when Cursor-native project controls and the active desktop agent fit the task
  • Codex: use when the supported Codex runtime is configured and its workflow fits the implementation
  • Claude: use when an eligible Channel or API path is ready and Claude-specific guidance matters
  • Cursor Cloud: use when the computer may be offline and the cloud execution boundary is acceptable

Why explicit routing is awesome

A multi-provider product becomes trustworthy when it refuses to pretend every provider behaves the same. FireCursor can compare readiness and task fit while leaving the final choice visible to the operator.

That also makes failures easier to diagnose: you can tell whether the problem belongs to pairing, the provider, the project, or the task itself.

Keep moving

See all thirty
Choose an agent4 steps

Use a Cursor agent from Android

Launch and steer a local Cursor agent from FireCursor with advertised model controls, project commands, file context, and review.

Operate a local Cursor agent without mirroring the desktop
Read guide
Choose an agent4 steps

Use Codex from Android with FireCursor

Connect FireCursor to the supported Codex desktop runtime, keep the repository local, and supervise a scoped coding task from Android.

Run a local Codex workflow with explicit mobile supervision
Read guide
Choose an agent4 steps

Use Claude from Android with FireCursor

Route a FireCursor task to a supported Claude runtime, understand plan and API boundaries, and control the run from Android.

Use Claude without hiding account or billing boundaries
Read guide